I am sure plenty of us are after a company that pays good dividends with a low price to book ratio, increasing NAV as well as decent ROA.
Superficially, Keong Hong (5TT) seems to fit the bill.
There are a few things I find worrying about this company.
1) Highly paid CEO-cum-Chairman
Probably one of the highest paid CEO/Chairman around for its Market
Capitalization. Do note that his salary increased at a crazy rate over
the years.
2011, it was stated to be above 500K.
2012, between 1.25 and 1.5
2013, no change
2014, it gone up between 1.5-1.75
2015, it gone up to between 2.75 and 3M (!!!!!!!!)
2016, no change
2) Share Option (? not sure if this is anything to be worried about)
it says here there is about 7m share options not exercised at the
highest price of 40cents. It has about 10m in treasury, and about 230m
shares in total. I am not sure if this figure is something to be alarm
at since I am inexperienced.
PB is about 0.8... okay discount. I don't see corporate or directorship
buying back shares for 2016... so I guess current price, as of now isn't
anything fantastic.
3) Balance Sheet Worries
Trade receivables makes up a large part of its balance sheet. This
company seems to be making a huge investment this year. It says here in
the cashflow statement that it loaned 60M to its JV. This is double of
any amount it did, in 1 single year, over the last 5 years or so.
History of this company's ROA (net income divided by total assets)
2011- 9.96%
2012- 15.2%
2013- 15.6%
2014- 8.7%
2015- 11.6%
2016- 9.71%
NAV per share
2011- 19.62 cents
2012- 13.35 cents (!)
2013- 41.8 cents (incredible! reduction of 4m shares as well)
2014- 34.4 (rights issue, from 156m to 232.95m shares!)
2015- 49.86 cents (reduction of 6m shares or so)
2016- 59.4 cents (increase of about 3m shares)
This significant increase in NAV might be due to leverage?
Debt to Equity over the years (all bank borrowings + interest-payable financial leases)
2011- 5.2%
2012- 1.66%
2013- 6.93%
2014- 27.9% (!!!)
2015- 59.4% (!!!!!)
2016- 46.6%
Leverage is okay but is the finance cost managable?
Interest cover over the years. (net income / finance cost)
2011- 76.2 times
2012- 301.97
2013- 347.89
2014- 60.69 times
2015- 27.87 times
2016- 8.82 times (!!!!!!!!)
This indicate the company is pretty decent in its management (based on
ROA), it is taking on an increasing amount of debt. Its ability to repay
debt, from its interest cover, is dropping significantly in the last 3
years.
Trade receivables is worrying high, and customer concentration risk of receivables from 5 customers is about 70+ percent.
At its gearing ratio and that investors are probably at this company for
its yield, I recommend a further discount to its current price before
investing.
At the moment, there are better companies with lower debt that pays about the same dividends at a lower risk.
Pages
Search This Blog
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Obviously, this will be the final update for the year. Portfolio Return: +1.99% Straits Times Index Fund: +1.03% S&P 500: 24.25% Hong Ko...
-
Obligatory food shot for the people in InvestingNote. Just kidding. The author is vested in Cordlife, and has 6% of his portfolio "inve...
September 2024 Portfolio Update
As I wrote, Alibaba just closed another 7.3% up in one day. CSI300 index went up about 7.21% itself (at one point, it was 10%). "The bo...
No comments:
Post a Comment