Pages

Search This Blog

Saturday, March 4, 2023

Feb 2023 Portfolio Update (Centurion, Yangzijiang Finance)

Despite sleeping very early these days, I was feeling perpetually tired throughout the day. That explains why this post is late.

I did a presentation some weeks back on value investing with Boon Tee:



STI Index Fund returns -0.52% (was 2.93% in Jan)
Hong Kong Tracker Fund returns 4.16% (was 7.84%) 
S&P 500 Index Fund returns 6.05% (was 4.19%)

My portfolio returned a measly 4.25% (was 7.15%), largely due to another round of correction by Alibaba and Central China positions. This was very much inlin with expectation; the overhang (of property worries) should continue for years. Alibaba isn't doing so great, in terms of market price movements, but it does look like they have managed to control cost. However, Alicloud and International Operations continue to be loss making. There is still no clarity in how one should value Alicloud and the (potential?) Ant Group IPO.

Transactions:

Purchase 2000 shares of Nanyang Holdings for my portfolio.

Nanyang Holdings is just a very cheap stock which main operations are good old rental and investment. The main investment is of course their Shanghai Commercial and Savings Bank, which is mainly based in Taiwan. I would readily say that banks and financial institutions are far beyond my circle of competence. However, the value is still apparent in other aspects of its balance sheet. I am just uncomfortable with their investment process-- it is too active for its own good.

Discussion on OKP, Centurion and YZJ Finance, as they had released full year (FY) earnings during Feb 2023.

OKP: 

While revenue is definitely higher, so are costs. The balance sheet looks far more fragile than a year ago, so now the investment thesis has become one of projection instead of protection. It was also revealed that 3m was spent in the arbitration with CPG Consultants. I believe, if OKP is successful, would bring significant one-off 'earnings' to the 53m market cap company.

********

Centurion: 

As usual, the dividend is a joke, and the stock price corrected a fair amount (8% intraday at one point). The only bright spot is that the debt is getting reduced. Amusing enough, I think it is far better to be a debt holder in Centurion than a stock holder. It had been 2+ painful years. 

Perhaps Centurion should do a major rights issue to bring down debt? Since the cost of equity (in dividends) is less than a Singapore Savings Bond? It wasn't that business was poor; things are actually picking up. So do the major rights issue, let's clear the debt in the books. In the mean time, management should show that they deserve to be management by:

a) Not increasing their remuneration, or best: be paid with stock options instead. Strike price should be significantly higher, lets say 25%, than prevailing market prices.

b) Voluntarily purchase securities in the open market.

On 22 Feb 2022, I wrote:

Results were much better, and the debt level was pare down by a modest 20 million. However, the dividend proposed was a paltry 0.005$ a share, much lesser than the expected 2 cents a share. The company put up a resolution to restore director and management pay for voting as well. This news depressed share prices, and whatever paper profits from profit alert, prior to announcement, were all but vanquished.

It is disappointing that 1 year from today, the narrative remains unchanged.

Let me put the numbers into context. Centurion is earnings between 70-100m in free cash flow over the years. The figures for 2016-2023 as follows:

 

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Free Cash Flow (m)

65.037

54.263

54.986

66.554

59.146

70.256

101.679

Dividend Declared (m)

7.399

7.957

8.408

8.408

0

8.771

8.412

Interest payment

21.383

21.545

23.929

28.759

23.319

22.734

28.341

Total Remuneration of Directors

(Retrieved from Annual Reports, Sect. 9)

0.38

0.422

2.113

2.422

2.68m

3.277m

2.971m (from earnings release)

 

I think the numbers above does not justify why dividends are suppressed over the years!

********


YZJ Finance: 
has finally released its full year earnings. Examining the balance sheet reveals:

-620.6m of cash
-2264.6m of debt investment, which are current
 407m of debt investment which is non-current.

This is the most important of the lot.

It is noted that 536m of those investments were transferred to YZJ Ship-Arm (parent) before the spin off. I thought initially that it was a protective move by the parent to relieve the child (YZJ Finance) of potentially bad assets. I also viewed the reduction of debt investments in 2022, of 1.7b from 4.57b, to be favourable. Management also stated that the interest income was 312m (see below). I think a yield of 10% for its debt investment is sufficient given the risk.





-413m of financial assets, which are mostly unlisted China equities (see below)
-322m in investment on associated companies. This associated companies are not disclosed, but likely related to YZJ Ship-arm.

On the liabilities side, there is a total of 332m, of which 228 are deferred tax liabilities. These are tax which are not paid and will be paid in the future.

Let's relist the assets and do some brunt discounting.
-620.6m of cash
-2264.6m of debt investment, which are current
 407m of debt investment which is non-current.
413m of financial assets, which are mostly unlisted China equities
322m in investment on associated companies

With cash, there is no discounting needed. The amount of interest income (20.5m) represents 3.3% which is likely reasonable.

With the debt investment, the management presentation slides indicate that about half was performing, with the majority of the other half being non-performing:
One would look at 2021's performing loans of 3.16b and wonder how did it turn up to be only 1.35b this year? Well, 1.6b was redeemed (refer to the first screenshot of this post).

However, I going to be brutal and write off the existing under-performing and non-performing portion from its assets. That would mean the debt investment would be worth only 1348b instead of the stated 2264m.

Obviously this is going to be too conservative since
a) There might be reversal of NPL, and given that management guided earlier that there is collaterals.
b) There is some residual income from the performing loans. Stated amount in the book is merely principal, and does not include interest.

I going to reduce the unlisted Chinese equities by 75% (overly conservative) because there is no way to look at those numbers (since they are not listed!)

I will also reduce the value of the investment in associated companies by 50%.

That sums up to be ...

Asset

Stated Value

Discounted Value

Cash and EQ

620.6m

620.6m

Debt Investments

2671m

1348m

Financial Assets (Investment in Chinese Equities)

470.072

138m (unlisted equities are discounted by 75%)

Investment in associated companies

322m

161m

Total

4083.6m

2267.6m                    

... a total of 2267m, and if we take away 332m of liabilities, the remaining value of YZJ Finance would be about 1.9b.

YZJ Finance, is listed at 1.46b. That represent a margin of safety of about 25%. Since my average price for YZJ Finance is about the market price, I would refrain from buying more stock. The dividend yield, based on a distribution of $0.018 per share, would be 4.7% for my holdings.

Let's wait and see.

Saturday, February 11, 2023

Commentary: Is it possible for Buffett to get the 50% annualised returns as said by himself?

 


Charlie Munger: "I would agree. I would also say what we did 40 years ago was in some respect more simple than what you have to do. We have it very easy, compared to you. It can still be done, but it is harder now. You have to know more. Just sifting the manual until you have something that is two times earnings. That won't work for you anymore"

Buffett: "It will work if you can find any"
***

There was a question on telegram some time ago with regards to this matter, and I spent about an hour thinking and writing a response.

Question: Buffett says if his portfolio is small, he is sure to able generate 50% return. What is this 50% return method he talk about? How to go about it?

 

Having being somewhat familiar with how Buffett invest during his before and during his partnership years, I guess:

 

-information advantage. He was willing to comb through Moodys and S&P manuals from first page to last, looking for cheap companies (either by book value, such as valuable investment portfolios/bond holding; or cheap by earnings, Western Insurance was one example). Sanborn Maps cost $45 and had $65 in its investment portfolio.

 

-intelligence. Able to see unobvious aspects of an obvious deal. The Rockwood deal was an example of this. Instead of arbitraging for 5.6% gains, he held on to the stock for a gain of 560%.





In the foot notes: it adds:




-(My opinion) He was willing to coat-tail (follow) the successful investors of his time. His ultimate objective was making and compounding wealth. He doesn’t care about the intellectual challenge of investing as much as his mentor, Graham did.

 

-doing the legwork (or getting someone to do it) for very obscure, thinly traded stocks. Example: Dan Monen helped to travel around to help buy National American Fire Insurance (a company that was a fraud until a turnaround by William Ahmanson). It was earning $29 a share and selling for $30. Unfortunately it was thinly held by non-insiders, who are scattered around the countryside. Some of them paid for $100 a share for the now much forgotten stock they have. Dan Monen went around, and by word-of-mouth, accumulating shares and eventually offering up to $100. They eventually hold 10%, versus the Ahmanson’s 70%.

 

-Willingness to concentrate heavily into ideas. He had, after speaking to GEICO future CEO, put ¾ of his net worth into its stock. In the Sanborn Maps idea, he put 1/3 of the partnership money into the idea, and during the American Express crisis, he plough in capital of similar proportions.

 

Quote from “The Snowball” (AXP wasn’t the only idea capital was concentrated on)



-He had a very good spouse in Susie, who attended to his every needs outside his investment work. E.g., besides the kids, Susie took care of Buffett’s dad during his last years.


***

The spouse part was not written in jest-- I believe that women have a huge hand in how men acts, and perhaps vice versa (I can't comment on behalf of women for obvious reasons).


Wednesday, February 1, 2023

Jan 2023 Portfolio Update

Hinderburg in Adani Colours. Art generated by Dall-E

As of 1st Feb 2023,

STI Index Fund returns 2.93%
Hong Kong Tracker Fund returns 7.84% (wow)
S&P 500 Index Fund returns 4.19%

My portfolio, excluding bonds (Singapore Savings Bonds ("SSB") and 6 months T-Bills) which I invest solely for my mum, returns 7.15% or 4.75% with it.

Performance trails the Hong Kong Tracker Fund, which is expected since it had a terrible, abysmal year. In terms of cost, 44.7% of my funds are invested in HK stocks, 48% in SGX and the remaining in US.

Current market sentiments towards the Chinese recovery remain positive to some what cautious. The main focus so far seems to have shift from the property debt crisis to what America is currently doing.

I do not believe the property crisis is behind us, just because the market prices has recovered some what.  Bond prices for Central China notes are still very much below 50% of face value. The following screenshot taken from Bondsupermart:

We are only 2 months away from the next call...

The current favor of the moment are Artificial Intelligence plays. The acquisition of OpenAI by Microsoft was the catalyst. The writing on the wall is that Google's search could be displaced, and Google's implementation does not impress.

Stocks which took a beating last year staged a strong recovery. IMO, I don't give a rat's ass how they do because they still look overpriced, and I would not change my game just to suit the market's taste. 

I have not purchase any stock this year as yet. I have wrote a modestly priced call for Alibaba at 135 HKD, and for a while that position was in the red. This was due to how volatile and positively charged the market was. Nevertheless, it expired out of the money. 

As most of my HK holdings are not large market cap stocks, an options market does not exist for them. Hence option selling (and buying) is not a big part of my portfolio.

***
Hinderburg Research had released a short report on Adani's Enterprise and its various subsidiaries. Unsurprisingly... the focus in the local papers were the impending stock purchase of the said enterprise by Temasek. Temasek's bad run seems to continue. I believe many would question the amount of due diligence, esp after the FTX incident.

IMO, shortist such as Hinderburg are formidable-- not only are they riding on the prospect of infinite losses, they could be threatened with legal muscle, viewed with skepticism (because of vested interest).

The outcome of this episode should follow the usual playbook: a heavily in-debt company tries to raise funds cheaply by issuing bonds or stocks that have the lowest cost of capital. It seems inevitable that great wealth generated by leverage would eventually face a moment of reckoning.

At the end of the day, the rich would be less well off, but it is always the poor that suffers. Labourers working in these firms face retrenchments. Politicians rarely makes a decision that overrides their self interests, be it to stay in power or to enrich themselves. 

My expectation is that unless someone could prove that political connections are involved, nothing will happen. On the contrary, if political connections were present, I would expect the accused be swiftly put to his/her place, and any previous political relation be severed just like a ballast weighing down an airship.

Till next month.



Saturday, January 14, 2023

The Sisyphean Nature of a Graham-ite "Cheap by Assets" Investing Style

A generated picture by Dall-E

Somewhere in the middle of 2020-21 when FANG (Facebook, Amazon, Netflix, and Google) stocks were enjoying popularity, a good deal of investors (even in the "value" oriented camp) preach about the virtues of buying "good" companies at reasonable prices. We call them GARP for short. 

The exact stocks in question isn't crucial, but the kind of stocks is.

The idea of buying GARP companies is that you do not have to buy them at dirt cheap prices. This bear elaboration: cheap usually refers to its price to earnings multiple, or its current price point in a historic 5-10 year chart. 

The idea is that the price is not crucial for GARP because the value of these companies compounded at a good rate, which means the value would eventually catch up with the purchase price even if the purchase price was not at modest levels.

Henceforth, the key question GARP investor have is whether there is a "runway" (is the company reaching market saturation?) or has it neared the TAM, or Total Addressable Market? Would its moat (and thereafter, their usually high ROE numbers) be breached by competition?

If we were to invert our thoughts a little on these companies, surely a few other conditions would make purchasing such companies a lot easier on the stomach.

For instance, if the target company in mind is not a well known titan in the industry, there would usually be the following (advantageous) features:

a) The stock would not be well followed, and therefore not "efficient." It has the added possibility of increased institutional ownership, which can boost share prices.
b) It is simply easier for a small company to grow than a large one. Apple would have to invent another amazing product to boost its already large revenue.
c) It would help that these companies are not in highly popular, competitive industries. 

I believe that the fortunes of well known ideas, especially those as large as FAANG and Tesla's, are fraught with friction. I have only one-and-a-half idea in my portfolio that are invested with the expectancy of moderate growth: FuShouYuan and a spin-off called RXO.

The rest of my portfolio consist largely of stocks that are "cheap by assets." I describe the title of this post as "Sisyphean," as the act of buying and selling such stocks is not too dissimilar from what Sisyphus was condemned to: roll a bounder up the hill, only to have it roll down when it nears the peak, and to repeat this act endlessly.

My approach is Sisyphean because when you buy a stock that is cheap by asset, something happens to the company and cause the stock price to go up. You would then sell it to buy another one that is cheap. This continues endlessly.

Have this investing approach been rewarding? 

For my case, it had been arguably mixed.

1) Innotek: 70%
2) Wheelock Properties: ~40%
3) Xinghua Port: about 57%
4) TTJ: 32%
5) CrossHarbour: 36%

That is absolute returns, which is deceptive. What about annualised figures? With the exception of CrossHarbour, and Wheelock Properties (for which were realized in a matter of weeks/months, both were >1000% annualised which makes no sense other than luck), the figures for the rest are:

1) Innotek: 57.3%
2) Xinghua Port: 94%
3) TTJ: 10.96%

What about the ones which have not been realized? OKP, which is a significant position, is still at a moderate loss (-10%). So is YZJ Finance (-7%) and Central China Management and Central China Real Estate (arguably not a "cheap by asset" position; -27.5% and -0.5% respectively), Nanyang Holdings (-21%), Clifford Modern Living (+2%), and Frasers Hospitality Trust (-15%). These figures include dividends.

During a discussion with colleagues about investing (I was merely urging them to adopt a dollar cost averaging plan with world index funds), one of my smart (but ignorant in investing matters) friend remarked that your job is your best investment. 

This is arguably right and wrong: it is wrong because you have to be physically-abled in order for this "investment" to work.

However, I drew parallels with that fault and my investment style: I have to be "around," or make very active investing decisions, to ensure that it will be profitable. Let's assume that I were to fall into a coma of 5 years, these stocks could enjoy a revival, but I wouldn't be able to sell! ; and by the time I am conscious, these stocks could possibly return into bargain territory again. I witness such fate in my short 6 years of investing. 

One of the things I envy about Buffett is his Coca-Cola and American Express holdings. Both had, as compounders, grew rewardingly in share prices, and providing meaningful dividends that beats the average returns of an index. What can be better than that?!

Investing in cheap stocks has its rewards and it is emotionally draining. It is not the easiest, but the most simple form of technique. And unless there is a huge market downturn (which could cause these compounder stocks to fall dramatically cheap in price), there is no foreseeable changes to my portfolio going forward.


Friday, January 6, 2023

Who Are You, and What Is Your End Game?

Tell me who your heroes are and I'll tell you how you'll turn out to be.” - Warren Buffett

(Side note: I ain't a huge fan of the way Buffett invest, particularly of the version that runs Berkshire Hathaway. It is a large entity, employed ways and means which aren't accessible by the small guy. But I like him enough as a person and love reading about what he does during his Buffett Partnership years)

I met up with a good friend of mine recently and pondered about what our end game should be. I do have a vague idea: when I am much older and alone, I would be living within a small residence in the company of a couple of cats. 

This is a picture generated by the wonder that is Dall-E:



Pardon the number of cats. Not sure why Dall-E generated only one. There would be a British short hair and the fat cat that lives at the void deck of my block.

Most people desire wealth-- the question is, "Why?" and not "How much?" 

Money is useless per se if it could not be used to buy something. So ultimately, it is the something that we desire. It could be a car, a kind of life, tangible or not. Munger wants freedom-- the freedom from shackles of having to answer to someone.
 
So why the quote at the beginning of the post? I find that a person's idol tend to be quite telling of what that somebody is, or desire to be. 
That, is literally the result of Dall-E when I enter the terms "Walter Schloss picking up cigar butts"


Unless you are a value investing nut, the name Walter Schloss would mean nothing to you. His returns are consistently better than the market's, and his investment approach is simple enough for a person like myself. He has no desire to serve the rich and the famous, or most of all, himself. 

He has never gone to college; I had a offshore learning liberal arts degree which I never put into use. He believe in thrift and have no worldly desires that I could think of-- I think I have been so for my whole life (which explains why I wasn't that driven in many aspects of life). My friend told me that I am like a blank canvas.

It wasn't because I dislike nice things. I just don't feel the joy (rapture?) of using them. I conclude that the end game is to find joy, from something or somewhere. What is the most beautiful thing in the world?

***

When I was starting out, I suffered a hefty loss speculating in small pharma stock. Falling down repeatedly, I told myself that I need to change. I need a system that was not only simple, but could work even if I am marooned on an island. I could think independently and this system could work reliably. 

On reflection, I think it is fair that I probably only half way there.

My wish in investing is that I could look at major market corrections calmly and take advantage.

My memory have not been great but I do remember 2020-22 pretty clearly. The biggest winners came from health, tech and the company everyone knows-- Tesla. Disruption was such a buzz word. Everyone around me wants to talk about those companies. Dollar cost averaging was encouraged for big tech and Tesla. 

I wasn't a fan because of a few reasons:
a) Back of the envelope numbers indicate pretty high multiples.
b) They are huge companies and there isn't much runway to grow (law of large numbers)
c) Competition will eventually come into the picture

[A] is largely about market reversion to mean as well as appetite/mercy. The mood of the market decides how much multiple a company deserves. The same company that have a 50x multiple could be sold down to a 30x multiple when growth slowed, or stalled. That is already a 40% loss btw! 

However, if they could maintain their ROE consistently, the market will usually priced them many folds in the far future. But the big companies have the size disadvantage.

With [B], the David (which is you) will find yourself in the company of Goliaths, which are institutions and big players. They have a tremendous advantage over you as an investor. They might be more in tune with the industry, intimate access to insiders, news; clearer understanding of the interlinking macro-economics data and its interpretations... the list goes on.

With smaller companies, the big players are just not interested.

[C] comes to everyone and erodes return over time, unless you have a competitive advantage. Few companies possesses that. As of writing, Tesla had to cut prices in China. That says something.

Generally, the kind of person that you are, affect the kind of beliefs you have, and the way you would invest. I am deadly boring and pessimistic-realist. I know my approach would bore people to death, but I know I can lose very little (most of the time), because I don't swing for the fences.

I have associates that seeks a more directly-rewarding approach such as  looking for catalysts or likely improvement in earnings. Another approach is to look at macro economic and anticipate which industries would enjoy tailwinds. I have doubts that these approaches work very well in the long term, but I know one thing very well-- and that these approaches are too tough for me and I should avoid them.

In short, it isn't that these approaches don't work. They are too tough for me.
I have to accept that I could not enjoy the fruits that these people could have, but I avoid the pains as well. 

My simpler approach will work fine in most years. There won't be a crowd cheering me on when I finish the race. Neither is anyone going to pat my back, nor do I have to call people dumb or donkeys to constantly validate myself (or derive joy from putting others down?) and feel good. 

***

If investing is a cross country cycling race, and you knew that you do not have the kind of physique to go fast for a long time, or couldn't climb over obstructing mountains to save time, then you have to use other tactics. 

Perhaps you could sleep less and cycle at a moderate pace. 

Or perhaps you are a tough cookie-- you could choose to pedal on even during the foul weather, unlike everyone else who is seeking shelter.
If you are the only person left delivering food in this weather, I guarantee that you will not run out of orders.

Investing is like that. You don't have to act in a manner that disadvantages you. Don't play games you can't play.

Be realistic of the expected returns with the kind of strategy you employed. You could 10x a stock in 1 year, doing something really stupid but you could lose the same (or more!) with the same approach.

I knew long ago that I could never get rich fast.  I couldn't bring myself to take on risky paths like leveraging, buying tons of call options. I would love to get rich fast.

And it is very frustrating because I could see my parents ageing day by day and by the day I "finish" this race, they might no longer be around. I started too late.

And I do feel like I am a failure for that. For the young ones reading, you have my envy. You have a lot of options. Start early, fall down enough times, and you will learn to balance yourself very well.

Thank you for reading and I wish you good health.

Sunday, December 18, 2022

Dec 2022 Portfolio and EOY Summary

As of 18-Dec (Sunday),

S&P 500 Index Fund:  -13.77%->  -17.36%

Hong Kong Tracker Fund: -17.22% -> -12.31%

Straits Times Index Fund: 8.24% -> 7.36%

My portfolio: -18.17% -> -12.17%

Transactions:

Further increase in Singapore Saving Bonds and Singapore T-bills. As explained earlier, these are for my mum. I have been laddering the investment-- for the uninitiated, it means to break up the total sum available for investment, instead of investing the total in 1 lump sum.

An example: assuming you have $100,000 to invest in t-bills. If you do laddering, that would mean:

Invest $20000 in Dec

Invest $20000 in Jan

Invest $20000 in Feb

Invest $20000 in Mar

Invest $20000 in April

The first batch that was invested in Dec would be available by end of May.

Given the popularity of these instruments, getting the full sum of $100,000 allocated is not going to be a sure thing. Laddering it this way also have advantages in liquidity-- in the event that we need money (I hope we will never end up in this scenario), that is 1 month of wait instead of 6.

End of Year Commentary
After a very kind two years of portfolio returns, this year's performance is the worst ever in my short history of dabbling in the markets.

The 80% total return lead over the current runner up, the S&P 500, has been cut to just 50%. Stock.cafe tells me that my XIRR is about 18%, which is great for someone as simple-minded as myself. However, it is scant consolation since this year is not just a down year per se, but also the year where the greatest amount of capital has been injected. So I actually endured a ton of unrealised losses. It was very humbling.

A discussion of my current holdings:

Like most people who invest in a value-oriented approach, none of my holdings were bought into because of good news. I will proceed to run down the list of companies in my holdings and provide the rationale.

My list of holdings look like a record of losers. My affinity for the disadvantaged started almost 30 years ago. Back then in my young teens, I was an avid street basketball player. Each day looked like this: once there are enough players are on the court, the "captains" will shoot free throws, and the winner will get to pick first.

I often pick the physically-inferior, the unpopular players. Because deep down inside, I know how it feels like to be nobody's choice. 

When it comes to picking stocks, I think I am attracted to problems because nobody likes them. But they have a lot of potential to come back... as long as they are not too badly priced. I used to avoid betting on companies laden with debt. I don't know when it started (probably with Centurion), but if I ever survive this year (it is really a very, very bad year), perhaps I will never be this haughty again.

To put it bluntly, I am attracted to problems just like flies are attracted to shit. I guess. Heh...

***

OKP: The biggest slice of the lot. I started buying OKP since the accident. It was at least 2018. Unfortunately this idea had not come to fruition. The last transaction was Nov this year-- I still have faith that this company is cheap and awaiting optimistically that the outcome of the arbitration would be favourable.

Alibaba: Everyone knows why.

Central China Real Estate and Central China Management (00832 and 09982 respectively): 9982 is an asset light spin off of 0832 and hopefully the cash/share is real. 00832 is deeply in debt and had a lot of bad news.
It took a lot of heart to hold on to both stocks. They did not receive much uplifting as compared to their sister stock, 9983, which deals with property management instead of property project management.

I don't know if I ever want to be in such a position again. 00832 has recovered significantly-- part of me which to liquidate after such a trying period. Part of me hoped for profits to justify all the pain and suffering I went through. 

Investing is very hard.

Centurion: Prices were brought down to earth badly due to COVID. Unfortunately, even without the COVID overhang today, the value is still somewhat being suppressed by management. Based on its previous earnings power, it is cheap. During 2020-21, I could see that the dormitory business is irreplaceable as there is no alternative along with the NIMBY mentality, especially in a land-scarce country like ours. 

YangZiJiang Finance: Another battered down stock. After reading the prospectus, I believe it is a case where by there will be defaults in its debt investment portfolio, requiring a huge amt of write-offs. It is a case of market overcorrecting the stock. However, I am not a fan of the chairman. YZJ Finance would rise and fall with CCRE and CCMGT unfortunately. 

I have strange affection for beaten down stocks, especially when they are spin-offs.

Fu Shou Yuan: This was another stock beaten down by COVID. It enjoyed a revival due to (I am inclined to believe) loosening of COVID-controls. I shall not say much except that the company deals with the after-life management. ROE is in the young teens. Such stocks do okay over long term.

Lendlease REIT: This was a COVID-recovery play; it had the least amount of leverage amount the retail REITS. I didnt not invest a great deal initially due to its customer concentration risk (2 main properties only back then). As time goes, the REIT decided to buy up JEM and also did private placements and a rights offering. After listening to the CEO, I believe that the REIT is in good hands. The REIT is also small and has room to grow.... unlike most of the giant REITS in Singapore.

Nanyang Holdings: Given how illiquid it is, I did not acquire a great deal of stock. This is one of my many holdings that went down >25%. The company have also subscribe to its full allocation of Shanghai Commercial and Savings Bank. It wasn't a popular decision-- about 1/3 of its shareholders voted against it.

To be honest, I have no idea how this company will pan out, i.e. what catalyst would there be? The oldest, first-generation manager had left this world. I doubt the successor will act differently. But there is a respectable price to value gap difference.

Perhaps this is why I like companies with problems. Nanyang Holdings has no known problems. Many others in this list does. The resolution of problems acts as the catalyst, and unfortunately Nanyang has none..

Activision: Arbitrage play.

Didi: Wrote put options and it went terrible wrong. Wonderful lesson.

The rest of the positions are too small to matter.

***

As 2022 comes to an end, I wish everyone reading this the same things that I prayed for every day: that my parents would be treated kindly by the powers up there. 

Tuesday, November 29, 2022

November 2022 Portfolio Update

 As of end of trading 29-Nov-2022,

S&P 500 Index Fund: -15.43% -> -13.77%

Hong Kong Tracker Fund: -29.32% -> -17.22% (huge improvement in 1 month)

Straits Times Index Fund: 0.92%  -> 8.24% (such optimism had nearly gone unnoticed)

My portfolio: -21.48% -> -18.17% (not much improvement)

Transactions:

1) Increase in T-Bills purchase for my mum

2) Modest increase in OKP

3) Modest increase in Alibaba (9988).

Commentary:

Portfolio lagged against indices this month, particularly Hong Kong. This is because much of the holdings are in Central China holdings-- which did not receive as much optimistic buy-ins as compared to its bigger, more well-known peers. I believe the boost in prices came from buy-ins from Chinese investors, and Central China positions are taken off stock-connect some time back.

I am more concern with my family life, as my mum suffered a huge episode of high blood sugar, and had to be sent to the hospital. She was warded in high dependency ward and subsequently in a normal ward. I spent the first day largely sleepless, as the hospital called in every couple of hours to report status; a blood test here, an urgent procedure next, and so on.

Now mum is safely back home. But life would never be the same again. Before this, we were much more careless with high glucose readings. Dosage has been raised, but readings remain stubbornly high. Luckily we are visiting the diabetes doctor next week.


Monday, November 21, 2022

CCRE liabilites: A mountain to climb

Daily falls of 8% and more is common with this stock.


Central China Real Estate (CCRE) is one of my sizable investments. It is one of those "high risk, high reward" bets, and probably the riskiest. Here is a note to myself, perhaps as a reminder to never take such bets again.

It is well known that the company balance sheet is in great trouble. Its share price currently reflect a price to book of... 7 cents to 1 dollar of asset.

Looking at their interim report in late Sep 2022, the numbers look equally ugly.

Short Term Debt,
...of bank loans and other loans, 5761.86m
...of senior notes, 5354.493m

Long Term Debt,
...of bank loans 3551.778m
...of senior notes, 10972.022m

=================

Payables,
...51622.988m (!!!!), of which 40B of it does not involve associates or entities controlled by the owner.

==================

Assets
... stated as Inventories, of which are Properties, under development 88075.223m (could this figure be trusted, since property prices are falling?)
... of properties already developed: 6554.351m

Cash: 3622.412m
Restricted bank deposits: 2885.414
Receivables: 5548.762

==================

as of now, the only good news is very publicly known: Henan Tongshenzhiye would be issued 29.01% of the shares float for a convertible bond, yielding 5% at 708m HKD. IMO, this is not a large sum and conditions laid out are not publicly stated.

If we were to trust the asset value, it sums up to a total of 106686m, or 106.7B. 
The liabilities (including the monstrous payables), total up to 77263m or 77.263B.

As such, it is clear that the market believes the property sales will suffer for a long time, and/or the value of the properties (be it developed or still developing) are overstated.

I am cautiously watching for news and believe that short of a miracle, it will be a long, winter-like wait till the company emerges from the weight of its troubles. 

一年一年过。

Tuesday, November 15, 2022

The Resumption of Best World

Best World resumed trading yesterday. Prior to that, it had conducted two "equal access buyback offers," both at arguably very low prices of 1.36$. I wrote an opinion after the first exercise was announced. I do think that the price was opportunistic.

So on Monday, I surmise that the patient and opportunistic bunch would bid up the prices. They did. From the open price of 1.47 (an 8% over the buyback price), to a day high of 1.87 (up 37.5%). The market calmed down and ended at 1.82.

Today, on the second day of trading, saw sell down till 1.57, representing a decline of 13.7%. It was pretty volatile, and ended with a doji candlestick pattern of 1.64. Volume on both days does not differ significantly.

At 1.64$ a share, and 440.121093 million shares (based on the latest announcement of share buy back conducted today), this means Best World is priced as follows, based on the 3Q filings:

Market Capitalization: 721.79m

Cash and Eq: 356.918m

Inventory: 77.352m

Receivables: 20.027m

Total Liabilites: 209.6m

Should we discount the value of inventories and receivables by 50% each, without discounting any for cash and eq, the quick and dirty net asset is of 198.9m, or round off to about 200m.

This means that a shareholder is paying 521.8m dollars in effect for a company that had been earning 54m (in 2017) to 140-ish million (2018, 2020, and 2021). It earned 70m in 2019. Based on any year, none of them look too demanding. 3Q filings does register decline in cash flows on a y-o-y basis.

The biggest contributor to its coffers appear to be still from China. So the worsening numbers could reasonably be attributed to the country's COVID control policies.

If one would had know that trading would resume in a matter of months, no reasonable shareholder would have participated in the equal access offer. None of the executive directors sold-- that would be expected. Those who sold had their money stuck in there for way too long.

What caught my eye is that board members, particularly the non-exec directors, as well as senior management largely remained in the company.

Purchasing Best World shares at the moment is difficult on a couple of counts: first, one would be aware of the possibility that the company would run foul of regulations/laws. Since board membership remains largely the same, I think the probability of it is low.

The second reason is likely price anchoring given how the stock surged on day 1. Maybe it would be easier to look at it from a value point of view; if there is still a huge gap between value and price, a 30% surge on a day might mean little.

So my back of the envelope math tells me:
Since the "net" asset is about 200m, and cash flow is about 100-140m in recent times, a no-growth multiple of 7-8, based on an assumption that it would earn about 90m yearly, means this company is worth about 200m + (630m to 720m) which round off to~ 830m to 920m. These are very "safe" and conservative numbers, indicating a margin of safety of only 15-27%.

The growth investor would baulk at these numbers and rightly so. But this is the stock market, and the market is never kind to companies that don't grow, no matter how much free cash they threw off yearly. 

The market and media, laughingly, would only claim that such a company is too cheap when they attempt to go private. Otherwise by and large they are believers of efficient markets.

If you would believe that the company could earn about 120m and ascribe a multiple of 10, that would mean the company is worth 1400m, an upside of about 100%! Valuation is very personal.

Given what happen to my portfolio in 2022, I think it is fine to be too conservative. 

As of writing, I do not have any positions in Best World.

Friday, October 28, 2022

Oct 2022 Portfolio Update

As of end of trading 30-Sep-2022,

S&P 500 Index Fund: -19.23% -> -15.43%

Hong Kong Tracker Fund: -19.48% -> -29.32%

Straits Times Index Fund: 3.17% -> 0.92% 

My portfolio: -15.13% -> -21.48%

The Hang Seng Index was a train wreck this week. On the first trading day after unveiling the Politburo,  it feel just about 6%, recover slightly during the middle of the week, only to fall 3% on Friday, with the tech index enduring a worse fate.

YTD, HSI's red ink exceed 30% with ease. If you had bought the Hang Seng index fund in 2016, you will still be losing money today.

My portfolio, which consist of almost 40% in Hong Kong stocks, is not spared from the torrid, horrifying HSI sell downs.

As for my own portfolio, -6% is actually way worse than it look, because of a huge amount of purchase in T-Bills this month. Without it, I am looking at likely 10% down this month.

Notable transactions:
1) Very sizable amount of capital into Singapore T-Bills, as parents are looking to invest money kept in fixed deposits yielding less than 1%. At their age, it is not prudent to buy stocks.

2) During this week alone, I picked up

a) Yangzijiang Finance, a fair amount of it, actually. It propped to my top 5 posiitons.

b) Alibaba

c) Central China Real Estate

3) Modest amount in Nanyang Holdings (increased liquidity and selldown in prices). It is extremely difficult to purchase this 

4) Liquidate Embecta to purchase some (3). Only to see Embecta go up by more than 10%....

5) Modest amount in Central China Management.

***

With unprecedented market volatility in Hong Kong markets, it is very tempting to keep buying the Singapore Treasury Bills. With an attractive (if you adopt a short term view and ignore inflation, in which both attitudes are harmful in the long run) interest rate, this seems to be what majority is doing.

But isn't investing all about not following the crowd and doing what felt painful? This fog of war is why investing is so difficult. You can't say that following the crowd is wrong; one could say that it is always the darkest before it is pitch-black. 

What feels like very bad bets presently?

REITs comes to mind. With risk free interest rate going up, REITS, which ironically are suppose to be inflation-fighting instruments, are now being sold down because of interest costs. With years of zero-to-low interest environment, one could be forgiven to think this way. There will no doubt be opportunities in buying some sold down REITs. 

I did consider reducing positions in Lendlease but the WALE and interest cover, does make it suitable for long-term holding. It was no doubt very depressing to see it go below the price where rights are issued (which I had subscribed). But if you had read your intelligent investor, you are a little better equipped (in the mind) to deal with broad market selldowns. 

Unfortunately, nothing could prepare you when the only stocks selling down are the ones you hold, and the market is enjoying a massive rally. I think that hurts a lot more.

Saturday, October 1, 2022

Sep 2022 Portfolio Update

As of end of trading 30-Sep-2022,

S&P 500 Index Fund: -12.44%-> -19.23% (a drop of 6.79%)

Hong Kong Tracker Fund: -9.9% -> -19.48% (drop of 9.58%!!)

Straits Times Index Fund: 6.61% -> 3.17% (drop of merely 3.44)

My portfolio: -9.12% -> -15.13% (drop of 6.01%)

Transactions made:

Increase of modest amount of Central China Real Estate due to reducing prices. Unfortunately the market price of CCRE fell from my purchase price of 0.4 HKD to currently 0.315. The selldown was relentless.

Speculative purchase of token amounts of Fraser Hospitality Trust. I am currently down about 10% from this position. It was stupid.

Average down on Fushouyuan Holdings at 4.46. The price is at multi-year low. If earnings power were to hold, the cash yield is approximately 7%. I should have started my purchase at this price tbh.

Purchase in a significant number of T-Bills (BS22119T ) for my parents. These are for 6 months and it is said that next month's Singapore Saving Bonds would be roughly this yield.

Commentary
Life have not been treating my family well this month. 

As soon as she was cleared of the suspect tumor in the pancreas, my mum have developed new a migraine which she could hear sounds when the ache pulses. I deeply hope this is temporarily.

As the doctor probed about if there is anything weighing on her mind, my mum started to teared in the room... I was hinted to leave the room so that she could open up to the doctor. I guess my mum opened up to her freely and the visit ended after another 20 minutes. The doctor merely mention that we need to monitor her headache and to spend more time with her as a family.

It isn't a sight that I could take very well... I have to admit that I am one of the most boring and passive person you could meet. I am poor at consoling or comforting someone... basically I am poor at dealing with human beings.

I digressed... let me revert to the topic of investing.

For someone who bothers with absolute performance, this isn't a great time. However, I lean towards the relative side-- if the indices were to do badly, my portfolio is not going to go unscathed. No ship could stay still in a storm.

All we could do is the wait patiently.

May 2026 Portfolio Update

Both S&P and STI is about 10% at the moment, while HSI is looking at about negative 1%. This year is not a great year... I am on 4% at t...